Screwup Obama

gr8nrg

Absolute horror
Joined
Apr 27, 2003
Messages
2,859
Reaction score
395
Points
0
"WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama is taking responsibility for mistakes in the handling of the tax controversy that led to Tom Daschle's withdrawal as President Barack Obama's nominee to be health and human services secretary, saying: "I screwed up.""

.....and that's just after 2 weeks being in the office....what does the future hold?! :noidea:

article
 
At least Daschle had the courage to stand down.
 
"WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama is taking responsibility for mistakes in the handling of the tax controversy that led to Tom Daschle's withdrawal as President Barack Obama's nominee to be health and human services secretary, saying: "I screwed up.""

.....and that's just after 2 weeks being in the office....what does the future hold?! :noidea:

article

His 'screw ups' all go back to one small detail...:yesnod:...his lack of experience :doh:
 
"WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama is taking responsibility for mistakes in the handling of the tax controversy that led to Tom Daschle's withdrawal as President Barack Obama's nominee to be health and human services secretary, saying: "I screwed up.""

.....and that's just after 2 weeks being in the office....what does the future hold?! :noidea:

article
He admits a mistake and for some reason that is a problem. Daschle is the one that screwed up. Obama is openly taking the heat for it, a maneuver that will probably be taken as refreshing by the general public (sure not the rabbid opposition, but they voted for Bush twice, so who cares what they think).

The Bush Administration... admit an error? Yeah... that'd never happen regardless how obvious their failure was.
 
He admits a mistake and for some reason that is a problem. Daschle is the one that screwed up. Obama is openly taking the heat for it, a maneuver that will probably be taken as refreshing by the general public (sure not the rabbid opposition, but they voted for Bush twice, so who cares what they think).

The Bush Administration... admit an error? Yeah... that'd never happen regardless how obvious their failure was.

"Ooops! I admit that I just demolished and signed away the country........my bad, I admit it.":bigear:

:doh: Kudos to him for admitting what is so obviously his 'mistake' :clap:.....now, as a leader for this country, we need someone with better judgment and experience....:yesnod:....:shhh: Presidents are not in a position to have the luxury of 'oops!' & 'do overs'....:faint:...and yes, I find that a 'problem'....:wink:
 
One appointment with a tax problem is an 'oops"

THREE appointments with tax problems is a CIRCUS.

Just a thought, If the fairtax were in place, none of these guys would have had tax problems!
 
I'm gonna go work on my taxes...now.
 
One appointment with a tax problem is an 'oops"

THREE appointments with tax problems is a CIRCUS.

Just a thought, If the fairtax were in place, none of these guys would have had tax problems!


I think Obama should keep on appointing people! If we get enough tax evaders then maybe it will make up for all the money the gov is putting in to "boost" our economy!
 
"Ooops! I admit that I just demolished and signed away the country........my bad, I admit it.":bigear:
That'd be an apples and oranges comparison. W's errors helped lead to the deaths and maimings of 10,000ish American Soldiers or the entirely needless suffering in New Orleans after Katrina hit and unforgivable federal delay.

Obama's mistake is not much more than a little egg on the face. It is important to keep perspective here.

:doh: Kudos to him for admitting what is so obviously his 'mistake' :clap:
How many mistakes did Bush fess up to? Any at all? Ignoring the terror threat prior to 9/11, the woefully run Iraq occupation, disaster relief, etc... serious mistakes that led to serious consequences.

Obama admitted error is certainly a nice change of pace. Yes, it'd be nice if Obama was perfect, but he isn't, nor can he be, so why string him up because he isn't?

.....now, as a leader for this country, we need someone with better judgment and experience....:yesnod:....:shhh: Presidents are not in a position to have the luxury of 'oops!' & 'do overs'....:faint:...and yes, I find that a 'problem'....:wink:
It is amazing, Obama has been in the job for less than a month and already people are ready to kick him out. Complaining about nominees with tax issues when the US military base in Kyrgyzstan is in limbo (which directly affects our actions in Afghanistan and is a result of Russian pressure on Kyrgyzstan) and the Obama Admin's reaction and resolution to that are the big fish, not the tax issues of nominees. That is how you decide the leadership of person, the important stuff, not the little stuff.

One appointment with a tax problem is an 'oops"

THREE appointments with tax problems is a CIRCUS.
One guy made an error that involved payroll taxes that was actually followed through when he paid someone to do his taxes. Another nominee had about $1000 in back taxes. Those aren't huge mistakes. They certainly are errors, but anyone that has to do their taxes as a self-employed contractor will know how unbelievably difficult they can become.

Tom Daschle, I'm rather glad to see him go even without his glaring $100+k tax error. While he seemed to be everyone's pick for the Health Care reform, he seemed to be too in with the Health Care industry.

Just a thought, If the fairtax were in place, none of these guys would have had tax problems!
The reason why the tax code is so complicated is so that the rich can avoid it.
 
That'd be an apples and oranges comparison. W's errors helped lead to the deaths and maimings of 10,000ish American Soldiers or the entirely needless suffering in New Orleans after Katrina hit and unforgivable federal delay.

Obama's mistake is not much more than a little egg on the face. It is important to keep perspective here.

How many mistakes did Bush fess up to? Any at all? Ignoring the terror threat prior to 9/11, the woefully run Iraq occupation, disaster relief, etc... serious mistakes that led to serious consequences.

Obama admitted error is certainly a nice change of pace. Yes, it'd be nice if Obama was perfect, but he isn't, nor can he be, so why string him up because he isn't?

It is amazing, Obama has been in the job for less than a month and already people are ready to kick him out. Complaining about nominees with tax issues when the US military base in Kyrgyzstan is in limbo (which directly affects our actions in Afghanistan and is a result of Russian pressure on Kyrgyzstan) and the Obama Admin's reaction and resolution to that are the big fish, not the tax issues of nominees. That is how you decide the leadership of person, the important stuff, not the little stuff.

One guy made an error that involved payroll taxes that was actually followed through when he paid someone to do his taxes. Another nominee had about $1000 in back taxes. Those aren't huge mistakes. They certainly are errors, but anyone that has to do their taxes as a self-employed contractor will know how unbelievably difficult they can become.

Tom Daschle, I'm rather glad to see him go even without his glaring $100+k tax error. While he seemed to be everyone's pick for the Health Care reform, he seemed to be too in with the Health Care industry.

The reason why the tax code is so complicated is so that the rich can avoid it.

YES! ~Excellent Point!:yesnod:
 
Have some more koolaide.....
You apparently can't tell the difference between:

1) saying someone (Obama) is untested on the important issues and we don't know how to judge his performance yet

verses

2) saying that Obama is the greatest thing to ever happen to the planet

Saying number two would seem to warrant a 'flavor-aid' (it wasn't kool aid) comment. What I said was that Obama hasn't been tested with the important immediate issues yet, though the recent Kyrgyzstan issue has come up and how Obama deals with that will have serious positive or negative implications on our efforts in Afghanistan. A positive outcome with the Kyrgyzstan air base will mean a ton more for the US foreign policy wise, military wise than anything negative that can come from Tom Daschle and his tax problems.
 
Last edited:
You apparently can't tell the difference between:

1) saying someone (Obama) is untested on the important issues and we don't know how to judge his performance yet

verses

2) saying that Obama is the greatest thing to ever happen to the planet

Saying number two would seem to warrant a 'flavor-aid' (it wasn't kool aid) comment. What I said was that Obama hasn't been tested with the important immediate issues yet, though the recent Kyrgyzstan issue has come up and how Obama deals with that will have serious positive or negative implications on our efforts in Afghanistan. A positive outcome with the Kyrgyzstan air base will mean a ton more for the US foreign policy wise, military wise than anything negative that can come from Tom Daschle and his tax problems.

You are right, he's "untested" because he's inexperienced....and it's showing already.....now is not the time for "on the job training"....your glass is getting a bit empty there, Jimbo....:yesnod:
 
You are right, he's "untested" because he's inexperienced....and it's showing already.....now is not the time for "on the job training"....your glass is getting a bit empty there, Jimbo....:yesnod:
Short of running the CIA, being the National Security Advisor, Secretary of State, what job exactly offers this level of Presidential Executive Experience?

By the way, Kennedy was green too and well... we saw his performance with the Soviets in the Cuban Missile Crisis. W wasn't as green... saw where that got us.

So these blanket classifications are kinda useless. I'll wait to see how the Kyrgyzstan thing goes.
 
Back
Top